Home > Tablet PC, apple, gadgets > Apple iPad vs. Tablet PC: A Comparison

Apple iPad vs. Tablet PC: A Comparison

January 28th, 2010

With the recent announcement of the iPad, I thought this would be a good time to do a comparison with the modern Tablet PC. As an on and off user of Tablet PCs for the past 7 years, I’ve had a lot of experience with the platform as it has moved from Windows XP Tablet Edition and Pentium III processors to modern Windows 7 versions on Core2 Duos. Still, I’m intrigued what Steve’s demonstration yesterday, and while I obviously haven’t had a chance to hold the new iPad, I have watched a number of demonstration videos and read several hands on, and I’ve used an iPhone on and off for almost two years. Thus I feel qualified enough to do a high-level comparison between the Apple iPad, and my Tablet PC, the Dell Latitude XT2.

iPad_home dell-latitude-xt2-multi-touch-tablet-pc
Feature Apple iPad Dell Latitude XT2
Screen 9.6″ Capacitive, multi-touch, LED-backlit at 1024×768 12.1″ Capacitive, multi-touch, LED-backlit at 1280×768, stylus supported
Weight 1.5 lbs 3.78 lbs
Processor 1 Ghz Apple A4 (ARM based) 1.4 Ghz Intel Core2 Duo ULV
Storage Up to 64 gigabytes of flash storage Up to 256 gigabytes of flash storage
Battery Life ~10 hours ~3.5 hours, or 9 hours with extended battery
Wi-Fi & Bluetooth Yes Yes
3G Optional, through AT&T at a discount Optional, through AT&T, Verizon, or Sprint
Connectivity Ports Docking connector, headphone, mic 2 USB, 1 USB/eSata, Expresscard, SD Card, Gigabit Ethernet, VGA, headphone, mic
Accelerometer Yes No
Build-in Hardware Keyboard No Yes
Multitasking No Yes
Adobe Flash No Yes
Built-in Camera No No
Applications available Select iPad apps at launch, including iLife, 140,000 scaled iPhone apps Complete Windows library
Price Begins at $499 Begins at ~$1999 ($999 refurbished)

Screen

The Latitude XT2 has a larger, more high resolution screen with the added advantage of having a built in stylus, which gives it the win here. The stylus also allows for effective note scribbling, something that is difficult to do with fingers. That being said, even with Windows 7’s new gesture support, Tablet PCs just don’t have the finger-friendliness of the iPhone, and, as an extension, the iPad. The iPad’s screen also looked a little brighter, and overall more fun to use.

Weight

While my XT2 feels fairly light, the added components and keyboard can’t compete with the slim, streamlined iPad. While I haven’t held one in my hand, I have to imagine that an iPad would be more comfortable for long periods of reading or browsing, though I haven’t really had issues with my XT2.

Processor

Apple has flexed its hardware muscles after the acquisition of P.A. Semi almost 2 years ago. The 1Ghz ARM-based A4 chip appears to be very fast, especially when paired with Flash memory and optimized software. The Core2 Duo chip in the XT2 may be a little faster, but without the level of software optimization that the iPad has, I’m going to rate this as a tie.

Storage

The iPad can hold up to 64 gigabytes of flash memory, compared with 256 gigabyes for the XT2 (and likely 512 gigabytes soon). Download some high-definition movies, and 64 gigbytes goes pretty fast. In addition, the XT2 can use ExpressCard and USB external storage and even USB Blu-Ray drives.

Battery Life

With 10 hours of battery life, I’m going to have to give this one to Apple. The Latitude (and most Tablet PCs) can get an extra battery, but it adds cost and weight. The iPad battery is not removable, unfortunately, but this seems to be the Apple trend of late.

Wireless Connectivity

Both machines have full 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-fi and Bluetooth, and also 3G access. The Latitude offers a greater variety of carriers for 3G, but the iPad has a much cheaper data plan at $30, so I’m calling 3G as a tie, depending on whether you value price or flexibility.

Connectivity Ports

This is where the decision to make the iPad a larger iPhone rather than a small Macbook begins to hurt. The lack of any real connectivity options means that it will be difficult to expand the iPad’s built-in memory, and a large range of USB devices, such as webcams and DVD drives, are not going to be available. The docking connector does allow video out with an adapter, but at a paltry 1024×768 resolution (the XT2 does up to 1920×1080 over VGA, and can do HDMI over the docking station).

Accelerometer/Keyboard and Gaming

The lack of a hardware keyboard on the iPad will probably be more off-putting than the lack of an accelerometer on the XT2. The XT2 can also use a mouse, which allows for a wide variety of mouse/keyboard gaming options. While I’ve enjoyed the accelerometer on my iPhone, I generally find it a bit gimmicky for gaming, and first-person shooters just don’t play well with touch-screen controls.

Multi-tasking

Another major Achilles heel for the iPad, and something I really hope is fixed in the iPhone OS 4.0 update. The lack of multi-tasking is problematic enough on the iPhone, but I know I’ll really find myself missing it on the almost 10″ screen. Why can’t I run an IM window next to my Flash game with Pandora streaming in the background (a common occurrence on my XT2)?

Adobe Flash Support

Similar to multi-tasking, this moves from a weakness on the iPhone to a serious flaw on the iPad. Steve called out the iPad as the ultimate browsing experience, especially over “underpowered” netbooks, but browsing without Flash means a decent chuck of the web is not available. Again, I’m keeping my fingers crossed for an OS 4.0 update, but I see this as less likely than multi-tasking support, though arguably more important.

Applications

I think that App developers may come up with some really neat applications for the iPad, but for the present, the 140,000 pixelated iPhone apps don’t compare with the huge library of Windows software available. In addition, Apple has rather draconian application development policies. Without full access to the iPad file system and hardware, I fear that it will again fall on the jailbreak community to develop useful utilities.

Price

Tablet PCs have failed to get mass-market adoption for almost a decade, and a major reason is that they are more costly than a laptop with similar specs. Apple made a smart move by offering a model with less persistent memory and no 3G at a lower price point. To be fair, the XT2 is one of the most expensive Tablet PCs on the market, as you can find models like HP’s Touchsmart at a $949 price with up to 20% discounts. In addition, most people using Tablet PCs do not have another laptop, which many iPad users will still want to price in a laptop as well as the iPad, leaving less available budget. Still, the bottom line is that the iPad runs away with this one.

Conclusion

The iPad has received its share of criticism in the past 24 hours, and much of it centers around a key design reality: the iPad is not a “Macbook Light”; it is an “iPhone heavy”. As a result, it has significant weaknesses compared to traditional laptops, unlike Tablet PCs, which are “Laptops Plus”. The comparison chart illustrates this, as the iPad only really wins on weight, battery, and price. The iPad is really for people that want a lightweight, cheap, limited device in addition to their laptop or instead of their laptop. In that respect, it fills the same niche as netbooks and eReaders, rather than today’s Tablet PCs, and netbooks and eReaders will be the real competitor, especially as more netbooks add touch capabilities.

The final piece of the puzzle is the full iPad experience. On paper, the iPad has a tough time competing with today’s Tablet PCs, and even today’s netbooks in many respects. Having not held one in my hand, I haven’t had the “magical” experience, but a combination of killer apps and a seamless, pleasurable UI may allow the iPad to make a name for itself. Time will tell.

As for me, I’m still waiting for the Microsoft Courier.

Tablet PC, apple, gadgets , , , ,

  1. Mr Speakr
    January 28th, 2010 at 19:37 | #1

    You conclude that the iPad competes with eReaders and netbooks, but I have to disagree. A netbook can multitask, load flash websites and has a keyboard allowing users to write long documents quickly.

    As for competing with an eReader such as the Kindle, Apple obviously don’t realise the reason people print out large documents to read, it is because it’s much easier to read text on paper compared to a backlit screen. Reading 100 pages of a book with led-lights firing into your eyes is not comfortable. In this regard, the Kindle still wins.

    I’m disappointed the iPad failed in every regard.

  2. January 29th, 2010 at 05:09 | #2

    Very impressive comparison.. I can see tablet PC is better in all terms but still IPAD is cool and in fashion..

  3. Jay
    February 6th, 2010 at 14:17 | #3

    Great comparison, but I think not enough emphasis was placed on one of the tablet pc’s main advantages: extended note-taking abilities. The handwriting recognition in Vista and W7 is phenomenal, and the inking with these EM digitizer-supported tablets is very precise and seamless, and thus the writing experience is extremely natural, as if you’re using traditional pen and paper. So far, it seems like the iPad will be very limited in this area, as anyone who’s ever tried to use any touchscreen-only device for extended hand-written note-taking can attest to (i.e., due to palm rejection and general stylus precision/resolution issues). Hopefully, some 3rd party developers can come up with a good workaround for this inherent shortcoming, because I think the iPad seems pretty amazing otherwise.

  4. February 7th, 2010 at 05:25 | #4

    Hi Jay,

    I did mention it in my post, but probably could have given it a little more weight. While Microsoft certainly has a head start with programs like One Note, I’m still waiting to see how well a capacitive stylus for the iPad might work and what kind of software developers create to enhance note taking. I personally don’t take as many notes as I used to with my Tablet, but for one particular iPad target market, students, it could become a major issue.

    - Josh

  5. Mitch
    April 12th, 2010 at 12:14 | #5

    I guess Mac OS4 puts a wrinkle in a lot of what is said here. I have the Dell, I like it but 4 lbs gets heavy quite fast when holding with one hand. I would prefer a smaller system I think.

    PS> Pandora ? You should be using last.fm ! :-P

  6. Paul
    July 9th, 2010 at 07:50 | #6

    Hi,
    Interesting comparison.
    My feeling is that major concern is linked to thhe productivity aspects.
    If user is a document producer (sales person, consultant …), Tablet PC is more interesting -> LapTop Plus.

    Should the user be a document reader (technician scrolling a documentation, limited mail production, document slide show), the IPad appears to be a must due to lower weight and energy capacities (+ feeling of being the one to own an iPad).
    Another advantage not listed here : iPad is ON is a few seconds, where laptops require 1-2 minutes. Urgent access to stored information wiull be available quicker on iPad.

    Recent OS solves the multitasking issue.

    Sounds great battle anyway ;-) ))

    Paul

  1. June 25th, 2010 at 14:44 | #1

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free